Category rating — not an assessment of any specific brand
This rating covers a typical, mass-market
home lifestyle product based on publicly available data.
It does not name or assess any specific manufacturer or product.
Individual products may perform better or worse.
Learn about verified ratings →
Category baseline
4.0 HIP
Below Standard
Category ceiling: 7.8 HIP
Regenerative Index
-4.0
Extractive
Category ceiling RI: -3.0
What this score means
The score shown is the current market baseline for home lifestyle — what the HIP methodology can confirm from
publicly available specification data alone, before any manufacturer evidence is reviewed. The category ceiling
shown in small text below the score is what the methodology rewards when materials, supply chain, repairability,
and end-of-life pathways are fully evidenced. Manufacturers close that gap by applying for verified assessment.
Manufacturer? Verified assessment closes the gap.
The current market baseline for this category is 4.0 HIP.
The category ceiling — what the methodology rewards when materials, supply chain, repairability, and end-of-life
pathways are fully evidenced — is 7.8 HIP.
The first verified product in our programme demonstrated 6.9 HIP and earned the HIP Mark.
If your product can evidence the methodology dimensions, verified assessment gives it the score it has earned.
Apply for verified assessment
Score Breakdown
Material Scarcity Index
20% weight
5.0
The product relies on stainless steel, silicone, and polypropylene, which are generally abundant materials not listed as critical raw materials. However, the recycled content is 20%, which falls below the 40% threshold required for a Low Scarcity rating. Additionally, the country of primary extraction is unknown, preventing verification of supply diversity and necessitating a conservative assessment.
Supply Chain Risk
18% weight
3.5
The stainless steel water bottle is assembled in China, a country with moderate governance scores but high concentration risk for stainless steel inputs. No due-diligence programme is documented, and no alternative suppliers are verified, resulting in a score at the pre-verification baseline for this category.
Recyclability & Circularity
18% weight
3.0
The product is a stainless steel water bottle, a material with high practical recyclability, but the lack of a submitted disassembly type assumes a glued construction which hinders separation. With an assumed 20% recovery rate and no take-back scheme or compliant labelling, the product aligns with the baseline for mass-market items where only specific metal streams are practically recovered. This score reflects the gap between the theoretical recyclability of stainless steel and the practical constraints of the assumed assembly method.
Repairability
13% weight
3.0
The product utilizes glued fasteners, preventing non-destructive disassembly, and lacks a public service manual. Although spare parts are available, the absence of a committed availability period and the use of adhesive align with the 'Difficult to Repair' criteria for mass-market items.
Social & Environmental Impact
8% weight
3.5
The product is manufactured in China, a moderate-risk jurisdiction, with no submitted third-party audits or environmental certifications. While the product type is a stainless steel water bottle, the absence of verified ILO compliance, RBA audits, or modern slavery statements places the assessment at the pre-verification baseline for this category.
Product Longevity
8% weight
9.0
The product features a 5-year warranty and a stated design life of 20 years, which exceeds the 10-year threshold for the highest longevity tier. The stainless steel construction supports long-term durability, and the explicit design life commitment places this item well above typical market norms for beverage containers.
Regenerative Index
15% weight · scale −10 to +10
-4.0
The product scores in the Extractive band (-5 to -1) due to 20% recycled content, which provides a partial mitigation against depletion. It is not Depleting because the presence of recycled content prevents the application of the -7 floor, though the lack of a take-back scheme and absence of bio-based or certified renewable materials prevents a higher score.
MSI 20% · SCR 18% · RC 18% · R 13% · SEI 8% · PL 8% · RI 15% = 100%
About the HIP Methodology ▸
Generic ratings are intentionally conservative. They represent only what the HIP methodology can confirm from
publicly available specification data, before any manufacturer-supplied evidence is reviewed. Most categories sit
in the 2–4 range at the pre-verification baseline. This is the methodology working as designed: it makes the gap
between current market practice and demonstrable resilience legible to consumers, manufacturers, and procurement
buyers. Verified assessment is the path across that gap, and the HIP Mark is the proof of crossing it.
Read the full methodology →
Consumer Summary
This stainless steel water bottle carries a HIP Score of 4.0 out of 10, matching the current market baseline for this category. Its Regenerative Index is -4.0, indicating that while it includes some recycled materials, it currently operates within an extractive production model. Overall, the product performs at the standard level found in the home lifestyle sector.
What This Means For You
When shopping for durable water bottles, look for items that offer long warranties and are designed for easy repair to extend their lifespan. Seek out products that provide clear information on their manufacturing origins and include third-party environmental audits. Prioritizing brands that disclose their use of recycled content can help shift the market toward more regenerative practices.
Data Transparency
This is a category rating based on publicly available data. The following data fields were not submitted by a manufacturer and have been estimated conservatively using open reference data and LLM training knowledge:
material_percentages
country_of_primary_extraction
primary_sourcing_countries
tier1_supplier_count
due_diligence_standard
alternative_supplier_exists
disassembly_type
recyclable_streams_pct
recycling_label_compliant
design_for_disassembly
fastener_type
spare_parts_years_committed
service_manual_public
ifixit_score
ecodesign_in_scope
manufacturing_countries
environmental_certifications
third_party_certification
rba_audit_completed
modern_slavery_statement
ilo_compliance_claimed
ip_rating
modular_design
software_support_years
primary_material_origin
takeback_scheme
regenerative_certifications
closed_loop_programme
end_of_life_programme
material_origin_certified
regenerative_practices
third_party_certification
A verified rating uses manufacturer-submitted data and produces a more accurate, product-specific score.
Material Watch Points
- No due-diligence programme documented
- Single primary supplier with no alternative
- Assembly in China with high material concentration risk
About This Rating
Produced under Resourcehip Methodology v1.3 (CC BY-NC 4.0). Assessed: 2026-04-29. Next scheduled review: 2027-04-29.
Dispute this rating · Our methodology · All ratings
Data Sources
This rating draws on the following public sources:
USGS Mineral Resources Program (public domain) · EU Critical Raw Materials List 2023 (CC BY 4.0) · World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (CC BY 4.0) · LLM training knowledge (for assumed fields — no manufacturer submission)
All sources are public domain or published under open data licences.
Full source list →
About this rating:
HIP scores are based on publicly available data at the assessment date.
They are estimates of material resilience — not guarantees of product performance, safety, or future supply conditions.
Resourcehip accepts no liability for decisions made in reliance on these ratings.
Scope:
This is a category rating for Stainless Steel Water Bottles and does not assess any specific brand or manufacturer.
Individual products may perform better or worse than this baseline.
Produced under Resourcehip Scoring Methodology 1.3.
AI disclosure:
This rating was produced using an AI scoring pipeline (local, no cloud — no data shared externally) and reviewed and approved by a human assessor before publication.
Scoring model: qwen3.5:35b.
The model's training data influences the findings — see the methodology for caveats.
AI transparency notice →
Not financial or investment advice.
Ratings are for consumer information only.
Dispute this rating · Our methodology · All ratings
Assessed: 2026-04-29 · Next review: 2027-04-29 · Methodology 1.3