You built a better product. Now prove it.

You chose cork over plastic, bamboo over MDF, recycled HDPE over virgin polymer. You know your product outperforms the mass-market alternative on material resilience. But "we use sustainable materials" on your website is not proof — it is a claim, and consumers have heard it before.

A Verified HIP Rating turns your material choices into a published, independent score. One assessment. One number. One mark that customers recognise.


Your data stays on our hardware

Resourcehip scores products using AI that runs on local servers in Scotland. Your materials data, supply chain details, and formulations never leave our infrastructure. No cloud AI providers process your submission. No third-party models train on your product information.

For a small brand, that matters. Your formulations and supplier relationships are your competitive edge — we treat them that way.


The problem for small brands

You are already doing the right thing. Proving it is the hard part.

You need independent proof that is affordable, fast, and designed for a business your size.


One rating that does the work for you

Resourcehip provides a single, independent assessment of your product's material resilience — scored across seven dimensions, not a self-declaration.

Our free category ratings use conservative defaults: worst-reasonable-case assumptions wherever evidence is missing. A Verified HIP Rating replaces those defaults with your actual product data. If your materials are genuinely better, the gap between the baseline and your verified score is real — not inflated.

That gap is your commercial story.

What makes the methodology different

The Regenerative Index

Most sustainability metrics stop at "less bad." The Regenerative Index scores from -10 to +10 — the only mainstream measure that distinguishes between products that deplete natural resources and products that restore them.

Five tiers: Depleting / Extractive / Renewable / Restorative / Regenerative.

Most manufactured products land in the Extractive range. That is an honest baseline, not a criticism. Products using certified inputs (FSC, PEFC, ROC) can reach the Renewable, Restorative, or Regenerative tiers — exactly the kind of materials small eco-brands already work with. Gold HIP Mark eligibility requires a Regenerative Index of +6 or above.


What you get

Tier Threshold
Standard HIP Score 6.0+
Silver HIP Score 7.5+
Gold HIP Score 9.0+ and Regenerative Index 6.0+

How it works

  1. See your category baseline. Browse our free category ratings to see where your product type stands under conservative defaults. That baseline is deliberately low — your verified data will fill the gap.

  2. Send us what you have. Materials composition, supplier details, end-of-life information — whatever you can share. We send the submission template when you get in touch. You do not need a complete dossier before making contact.

  3. Get rated and published. We review your evidence against the HIP methodology and publish your Verified Rating. If you score 6.0 or above, we issue the HIP Mark licence.

Simple process, clear pricing, no ongoing consulting fees. See the pricing schedule for details.


Independence and accountability

The assessment fee buys an assessment, not an outcome. It covers the cost of reviewing your evidence against the methodology. It does not influence the score.

If your product scores below 6.0 — or below the category baseline — we publish that result. We do not suppress unfavourable ratings or allow withdrawal from publication after assessment. The integrity of the mark depends on this: a HIP Mark that only appeared on products that paid for good news would be worthless to the consumers and procurement teams you are trying to reach.

The methodology has structural limits that no commercial relationship can override. Self-reported claims on the Social and Environmental Impact dimension cannot score above 5 out of 10 — third-party audit evidence is required to go higher. The same principle applies to the Regenerative Index, where self-reported claims cap at +4. These limits are enforced in the scoring pipeline, not at editorial discretion.

We will publish, annually, the percentage of verified assessments that do not qualify for a HIP Mark. Transparency about failure rates is how we prove the mark means something.

For the full technical detail, see Independence and conflict of interest in the methodology.


Ready to close the gap?

Your product is almost certainly better than the conservative baseline. A Verified Rating proves it — scored locally, published independently, and designed for brands your size.

Browse Ratings Submit a Product Talk to Us
View full pricing schedule →

For the full technical methodology, visit the Professional section.