Category rating — not an assessment of any specific brand
This rating covers a typical, mass-market
small appliances product based on publicly available data.
It does not name or assess any specific manufacturer or product.
Individual products may perform better or worse.
Learn about verified ratings →
Category baseline
3.0 HIP
Below Standard
Category ceiling: 7.2 HIP
Regenerative Index
-7.0
Depleting
Category ceiling RI: -3.0
What this score means
The score shown is the current market baseline for small appliances — what the HIP methodology can confirm from
publicly available specification data alone, before any manufacturer evidence is reviewed. The category ceiling
shown in small text below the score is what the methodology rewards when materials, supply chain, repairability,
and end-of-life pathways are fully evidenced. Manufacturers close that gap by applying for verified assessment.
Manufacturer? Verified assessment closes the gap.
The current market baseline for this category is 3.0 HIP.
The category ceiling — what the methodology rewards when materials, supply chain, repairability, and end-of-life
pathways are fully evidenced — is 7.2 HIP.
The first verified product in our programme demonstrated 6.9 HIP and earned the HIP Mark.
If your product can evidence the methodology dimensions, verified assessment gives it the score it has earned.
Apply for verified assessment
Score Breakdown
Material Scarcity Index
20% weight
3.5
The product contains nickel and copper, which are designated as Critical Raw Materials by the EU and carry high supply-risk designations from the USGS. The absence of submitted recycled content data and the likelihood of single-country extraction concentration for these metals in China drive a conservative score in the Scarce range.
Supply Chain Risk
18% weight
3.5
The kettle's primary materials (copper, steel, and plastics) are likely sourced from China, which presents moderate concentration risk for certain components and falls into OECD category 3-4 for governance. The lack of a submitted due-diligence standard or verified alternative suppliers prevents a higher rating, placing the supply chain in the high-risk category.
Recyclability & Circularity
18% weight
3.0
The kettle is assumed to be glued with no take-back scheme, limiting practical recovery to approximately 20% of its weight (primarily metal components). Materials like ABS plastic and nichrome heating elements are technically recyclable but are routinely landfilled in standard infrastructure, preventing a higher score.
Repairability
13% weight
2.0
The product is assumed to be glued shut with no spare parts available and no public service manual, classifying it as unrepairable. As a mass-market kettle without a parts programme or iFixit score, it is designed for replacement rather than repair.
Social & Environmental Impact
8% weight
3.5
The product is manufactured in China, a moderate-to-high risk jurisdiction, with no submitted third-party audits, environmental certifications, or modern slavery statements. While ILO compliance is not claimed, the absence of independent verification or managed risk indicators places this in the elevated risk category.
Product Longevity
8% weight
4.0
The product has a 2-year warranty and a stated design life of 5 years, which aligns with typical mass-market small appliance norms. However, the lack of an IP rating and modular design prevents a higher score, as it relies on standard fasteners without explicit long-term parts commitments.
Regenerative Index
15% weight · scale −10 to +10
-7.0
The product is scored as Depleting because it relies on virgin mined materials with zero recycled content and no take-back scheme, fitting the criteria for conventional appliances. It does not qualify for the Extractive band minimum of -3 because the required 50% recycled content and verified take-back are absent. Consequently, the product actively depletes finite geological reserves with no credible pathway toward regeneration.
MSI 20% · SCR 18% · RC 18% · R 13% · SEI 8% · PL 8% · RI 15% = 100%
About the HIP Methodology ▸
Generic ratings are intentionally conservative. They represent only what the HIP methodology can confirm from
publicly available specification data, before any manufacturer-supplied evidence is reviewed. Most categories sit
in the 2–4 range at the pre-verification baseline. This is the methodology working as designed: it makes the gap
between current market practice and demonstrable resilience legible to consumers, manufacturers, and procurement
buyers. Verified assessment is the path across that gap, and the HIP Mark is the proof of crossing it.
Read the full methodology →
Consumer Summary
This kettle has an overall HIP Score of 3.0 out of 10, indicating it performs poorly in terms of sustainability. Its Regenerative Index is -7.0, which means the product relies entirely on new materials and is designed in a way that makes it difficult to repair or recycle. Essentially, this appliance is not built to last or to be recovered at the end of its life.
What This Means For You
When shopping for small appliances like kettles, look for products that offer spare parts and come with clear repair instructions to extend their lifespan. Avoid items that are glued shut or lack a warranty, as these are often impossible to fix and end up as waste. Choosing durable, repairable designs helps reduce the demand for new raw materials and supports a more circular economy.
Data Transparency
This is a category rating based on publicly available data. The following data fields were not submitted by a manufacturer and have been estimated conservatively using open reference data and LLM training knowledge:
material_percentagesrecycled_content_pctcountry_of_primary_extractionprimary_sourcing_countriestier1_supplier_countdue_diligence_standardalternative_supplier_existsdisassembly_typerecyclable_streams_pctrecycling_label_complianttakeback_schemedesign_for_disassemblyfastener_typespare_parts_availablespare_parts_years_committedservice_manual_publicifixit_scoreecodesign_in_scopemanufacturing_countriesenvironmental_certificationsthird_party_certificationrba_audit_completedmodern_slavery_statementilo_compliance_claimedip_ratingmodular_designsoftware_support_yearsprimary_material_originrecycled_content_pcttakeback_schemeregenerative_certificationsclosed_loop_programmeend_of_life_programmematerial_origin_certifiedregenerative_practicesthird_party_certification
A verified rating uses manufacturer-submitted data and produces a more accurate, product-specific score.
Material Watch Points
- Nickel — EU Critical Raw Materials list
- Copper — USGS High Supply Risk
- Recycled content assumed at 0%
- Primary materials likely concentrated in China (OECD category 3-4)
- No due-diligence programme documented
- No alternative supplier documented
About This Rating
Produced under Resourcehip Methodology v1.3 (CC BY-NC 4.0). Assessed: 2026-04-18. Next scheduled review: 2027-04-18.
Dispute this rating · Our methodology · All ratings
Data Sources
This rating draws on the following public sources:
USGS Mineral Resources Program (public domain) · EU Critical Raw Materials List 2023 (CC BY 4.0) · World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (CC BY 4.0) · LLM training knowledge (for assumed fields — no manufacturer submission)
All sources are public domain or published under open data licences.
Full source list →
About this rating:
HIP scores are based on publicly available data at the assessment date.
They are estimates of material resilience — not guarantees of product performance, safety, or future supply conditions.
Resourcehip accepts no liability for decisions made in reliance on these ratings.
Scope:
This is a category rating for Kettles and does not assess any specific brand or manufacturer.
Individual products may perform better or worse than this baseline.
Produced under Resourcehip Scoring Methodology 1.3.
AI disclosure:
This rating was produced using an AI scoring pipeline (local, no cloud — no data shared externally) and reviewed and approved by a human assessor before publication.
Scoring model: qwen3.5:35b.
The model's training data influences the findings — see the methodology for caveats.
AI transparency notice →
Not financial or investment advice.
Ratings are for consumer information only.
Dispute this rating · Our methodology · All ratings
Assessed: 2026-04-18 · Next review: 2027-04-18 · Methodology 1.3
