Category ceiling
7.3 HIP
This is what the HIP methodology rewards when a product in this category fully evidences material provenance,
supply-chain integrity, repairability, and end-of-life pathways.
It is the benchmark for verified assessment — not a product currently on sale.
HIP Score
7.3/10
Standard
At category baseline (7.3)
Category ceiling: 7.3 HIP
Regenerative Index
-3.0
Extractive
At category average (-3.0)
Category ceiling RI: -3.0
HIP Mark Standard
This verified product achieved a HIP Score of 7.3, qualifying for the HIP Mark Standard tier.
Score Breakdown
Material Scarcity Index
20% weight
9.0
The product relies on abundant materials like stainless steel, copper, and plastics with no critical raw materials dominating the composition. It achieves an exemplary score due to 95% recycled content and diversified supply chains across Germany and Chile, eliminating single-country concentration risks.
Supply Chain Risk
18% weight
6.0
The electric kettle's supply chain is sourced from Germany and Chile, both politically stable jurisdictions with low risk profiles. The presence of an OECD due-diligence framework and a documented alternative supplier mitigates concentration risks, though the lack of third-party audit verification limits the score to the moderate range.
Recyclability & Circularity
18% weight
7.5
The electric kettle features screw-based disassembly and a verified take-back scheme, enabling high material recovery. While the submitted 98% recyclable streams is theoretically high, practical recovery for small appliances typically caps around 70-80% due to unrecoverable components like heating elements and mixed plastics, placing it in the 'Well-Designed for Recovery' band.
Repairability
13% weight
9.0
This electric kettle achieves an exemplary repairability score driven by a verified iFixit score of 9, indicating a fully screw-fastened design with no adhesive on functional components. The manufacturer provides a comprehensive public service manual and commits to a spare parts programme for 15 years, exceeding the 10-year benchmark for this category. Assembly in Germany further supports high manufacturing standards consistent with this level of repairability.
Social & Environmental Impact
8% weight
8.0
The manufacturer demonstrates verified good practice through an RBA audit completion, ISO 14001:2015 certification, and ResponsibleSteel credentials, combined with manufacturing in Germany, a low-risk jurisdiction with strong labour enforcement. While a modern slavery statement and ILO compliance claims are present, the RBA audit and environmental certifications provide the necessary third-party verification to justify a high score.
Product Longevity
8% weight
9.0
The product demonstrates exceptional longevity with a 7-year warranty and a stated design life of 15 years, exceeding the 10-year threshold for the highest tier. The modular design further supports extended usability, aligning with the 'Designed for Life' criteria despite the lack of submitted IP rating data.
Regenerative Index
15% weight · scale −10 to +10
-3.0
The product qualifies for the Extractive band minimum of -3 because it has 95% recycled content and a verified take-back scheme, explicitly excluding the Depleting floor. While the closed-loop programme and ResponsibleSteel certification are strong mitigating factors, the absence of Regenerative Organic Certified (ROC) inputs or verified net-positive ecosystem restoration prevents a score in the Restorative or Regenerative bands.
MSI 20% · SCR 18% · RC 18% · R 13% · SEI 8% · PL 8% · RI 15% = 100%
About the HIP Methodology ▸
Generic ratings are intentionally conservative. They represent only what the HIP methodology can confirm from
publicly available specification data, before any manufacturer-supplied evidence is reviewed. Most categories sit
in the 2–4 range at the pre-verification baseline. This is the methodology working as designed: it makes the gap
between current market practice and demonstrable resilience legible to consumers, manufacturers, and procurement
buyers. Verified assessment is the path across that gap, and the HIP Mark is the proof of crossing it.
Read the full methodology →
Consumer Summary
This electric kettle earns a HIP Score of 7.3 out of 10, reflecting a well-designed appliance built to last with excellent repairability and a long warranty. It also achieves a Regenerative Index of -3.0, indicating that it is made from a high percentage of recycled materials and includes a verified program to recover those materials at the end of its life.
What This Means For You
When shopping for small appliances, look for products that offer long warranties and are designed for easy repair to ensure they last for years. You should also prioritize items that use recycled materials and have clear take-back schemes, as these features help close the loop on resource use.
Improvement Opportunities
| Dimension |
Current Score |
Potential |
Action |
| (To be completed after human review) |
— |
— |
— |
About This Rating
Produced under Resourcehip Methodology v1.3 (CC BY-NC 4.0). Assessed: 2026-04-20. Next scheduled review: 2027-04-20.
Dispute this rating · Our methodology · All ratings
Data Sources
This rating draws on the following public sources:
USGS Mineral Resources Program (public domain) · EU Critical Raw Materials List 2023 (CC BY 4.0) · World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (CC BY 4.0) · LLM training knowledge (for assumed fields — no manufacturer submission)
All sources are public domain or published under open data licences.
Full source list →
About this rating:
HIP scores are based on publicly available data and manufacturer-submitted information at the assessment date.
They are estimates of material resilience — not guarantees of product performance, safety, or future supply conditions.
Resourcehip accepts no liability for decisions made in reliance on these ratings.
Scope:
This is a verified product rating for Category Ceiling, assessed using manufacturer-submitted data and public category data.
Produced under Resourcehip Scoring Methodology 1.3.
AI disclosure:
This rating was produced using an AI scoring pipeline (local, no cloud — no data shared externally) and reviewed and approved by a human assessor before publication.
Scoring model: qwen3.5:35b.
The model's training data influences the findings — see the methodology for caveats.
AI transparency notice →
Not financial or investment advice.
Ratings are for consumer information only.
Dispute this rating · Our methodology · All ratings
· Submit updated data
Assessed: 2026-04-20 · Next review: 2027-04-20 · Methodology 1.3
