Category ceiling
7.1 HIP
This is what the HIP methodology rewards when a product in this category fully evidences material provenance,
supply-chain integrity, repairability, and end-of-life pathways.
It is the benchmark for verified assessment — not a product currently on sale.
HIP Score
7.1/10
Standard
At category baseline (7.1)
Category ceiling: 7.1 HIP
Regenerative Index
-2.0
Extractive
At category average (-2.0)
Category ceiling RI: -2.0
HIP Mark Standard
This verified product achieved a HIP Score of 7.1, qualifying for the HIP Mark Standard tier.
Score Breakdown
Material Scarcity Index
20% weight
8.5
The product scores highly due to its 62% recycled content and reliance on abundant materials like steel and aluminium. While copper is present, it is sourced from Chile with verified certification, and no critical raw materials dominate the composition by weight.
Supply Chain Risk
18% weight
6.0
The fridge-freezer benefits from sourcing in Germany and the EU, which are low-risk jurisdictions, and utilizes the OECD Due Diligence Guidance. However, the score is capped at 6 because the specific primary materials are not listed, preventing verification of EU Critical Raw Material exposure, and the due diligence is not confirmed as third-party audited.
Recyclability & Circularity
18% weight
8.0
This fridge-freezer achieves a high recyclability score due to its screw-based disassembly, verified 85% material recovery, and compliance with recycling labels. The presence of a manufacturer take-back scheme and design for disassembly aligns with the 'Well-Designed for Recovery' criteria, distinguishing it from standard appliances that rely solely on infrastructure.
Repairability
13% weight
7.0
The product features all standard screws and has spare parts available for 15 years, supported by a public service manual. With an iFixit score of 7 and compliance within EU Ecodesign scope, it meets the criteria for being designed for repair.
Social & Environmental Impact
8% weight
8.0
The manufacturer demonstrates verified good practice with an RBA audit completed and ISO 14001 certification in a low-risk jurisdiction (Germany). The presence of ASI certification for aluminium and an EU Energy Label further validates environmental stewardship, while the modern slavery statement confirms ongoing due diligence.
Product Longevity
8% weight
9.5
This fridge-freezer demonstrates exceptional longevity with a 10-year warranty and a stated 20-year design life, far exceeding the 10-year threshold for the highest tier. The modular design further supports extended usability by enabling component replacement, aligning with the 'Designed for Life' criteria.
Regenerative Index
15% weight · scale −10 to +10
-2.0
The product qualifies for the Extractive band (-5 to -1) due to 62% recycled content and a verified take-back scheme, explicitly avoiding the Depleting floor (-7). While the closed-loop programme and ResponsibleSteel certification are positive, the absence of Regenerative Organic Certified (ROC) materials or verified ecosystem restoration prevents a score in the Restorative or Regenerative bands.
MSI 20% · SCR 18% · RC 18% · R 13% · SEI 8% · PL 8% · RI 15% = 100%
About the HIP Methodology ▸
Generic ratings are intentionally conservative. They represent only what the HIP methodology can confirm from
publicly available specification data, before any manufacturer-supplied evidence is reviewed. Most categories sit
in the 2–4 range at the pre-verification baseline. This is the methodology working as designed: it makes the gap
between current market practice and demonstrable resilience legible to consumers, manufacturers, and procurement
buyers. Verified assessment is the path across that gap, and the HIP Mark is the proof of crossing it.
Read the full methodology →
Consumer Summary
This fridge-freezer earns an overall HIP Score of 7.1 out of 10, reflecting strong performance in durability and recyclability. It also achieves a Regenerative Index of -2.0, indicating that its use of recycled materials and take-back programs helps it move toward a more circular lifecycle.
What This Means For You
When shopping for large appliances, look for models with long warranties and clear instructions for repair, as these features significantly extend a product's useful life. You should also prioritize items made with recycled content and those that offer take-back schemes, as these choices actively support a more sustainable manufacturing cycle.
Material Watch Points
- Copper — EU Critical Raw Materials list
Improvement Opportunities
| Dimension |
Current Score |
Potential |
Action |
| (To be completed after human review) |
— |
— |
— |
About This Rating
Produced under Resourcehip Methodology v1.3 (CC BY-NC 4.0). Assessed: 2026-04-26. Next scheduled review: 2027-04-26.
Dispute this rating · Our methodology · All ratings
Data Sources
This rating draws on the following public sources:
USGS Mineral Resources Program (public domain) · EU Critical Raw Materials List 2023 (CC BY 4.0) · World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (CC BY 4.0) · LLM training knowledge (for assumed fields — no manufacturer submission)
All sources are public domain or published under open data licences.
Full source list →
About this rating:
HIP scores are based on publicly available data and manufacturer-submitted information at the assessment date.
They are estimates of material resilience — not guarantees of product performance, safety, or future supply conditions.
Resourcehip accepts no liability for decisions made in reliance on these ratings.
Scope:
This is a verified product rating for Category Ceiling, assessed using manufacturer-submitted data and public category data.
Produced under Resourcehip Scoring Methodology 1.3.
AI disclosure:
This rating was produced using an AI scoring pipeline (local, no cloud — no data shared externally) and reviewed and approved by a human assessor before publication.
Scoring model: qwen3.5:35b.
The model's training data influences the findings — see the methodology for caveats.
AI transparency notice →
Not financial or investment advice.
Ratings are for consumer information only.
Dispute this rating · Our methodology · All ratings
· Submit updated data
Assessed: 2026-04-26 · Next review: 2027-04-26 · Methodology 1.3
